The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is hosting four
regional forums to poll the industry on a plan to
develop template designs for 41 building facility
types for the six major areas across the country
as defined under BRAQ. Don Basham, chief engineer
of the Corps, says the outreach is to gain
feedback and build a list of interested
contractors. "We want to know if we were to
structure contracts like this and put them out,
would contractors be interested? If not, what
would it take to get them interested?"
The Corps is modifying its procurement strategy to
meet demands of supporting the Army's ongoing
transformation to a more modular, quick-response
organization. Standard modules will be designed
that can be replicated across the country, with
adjustments to accommodate climate variations.
Procurement will be doled out by eight "centers of
standardization" (CoS) in Corps district
headquarters across the country. "Each center will
manage several of these facility types and will
award design build contracts," Basham says.
Fort Worth, for instance, will handle all the
barracks and warehouse jobs, while Norfolk will
handle four types of facilities, including
education and dining. The Huntsville CoS will
oversee administration of eight different types of
design build contracts, including fitness centers
and child care. Louisville CoS will manage six
different types of facilities, while Mobile will
oversee only two: hangars and avionics, and
four-star headquarters. "We understand the
geographic differences in different regions in the
country," Basham says. "Part of the center's
obligation will be oversight of each of the
regions, including lessons learned about energy
efficiency and project delivery methods."
The first of the four regional meetings was held
July 31, near Washington, D.C., and drew 200
industry attendees. Some of the attendees voiced
concerns that unstamped, standard designs will be
distributed by the Corps with project awards, but
engineering responsibility will remain with the
industry. They were also concerned that the design
build contracts for the more lucrative projects
may be let through CoS not close to home.
However, the Corps utilized an internet-based
market research questionnaire at the forums and
recommended attendance at only one event, which
underscored its attempts to streamline and
universalize the process.
Once the initial design build project is completed
(either by the Corps or the private sector),
projects can move to "adapt built," Basham says,
changing exterior cladding, foundation and HVAC to
meet architectural motifs and climatic
requirements. "The idea is not to re-design that
entire barracks or dining hall facility 100%, but
once the architect or engineer puts his stamp on
it, the contractor ought to be able to replicate
it as many times as necessary," he says. "Clearly
one of the outcomes will be reduced design, so
projects can go onto the ground quicker, and be
delivered at reduced cost."
Tom Anglim, a principal with the design firm
Ellerbe Becket of Minneapolis, Minn., attended the
July 31 forum and agreed that the concept should
require less design and provide more streamlined
delivery. "Contractors will probably get some
efficiencies in building more than one of these
around the country and, site adapting, from the
design standpoint, means less design work
involved."
Currently, the Corps handles 25-30% of its design
in-house, and 100% of construction is handled by
the private sector, Basham says. The Corps will
likely continue to handle some design build, in an
effort to maintain skill levels, but by no means
is the intention to mass-produce lesser quality
designs.
"People are always saying the DOD ought to use
industry standards, and they are asking the
industry what those standards would be," Anglim
says. "I found it very informative in terms of the
building type because it helps firms look ahead
and see where centers will be in the next few
years."
These forums aren't "the last word" on the CoS,
Basham says. "We're inviting their comments and
using the information to fine tune it. We've
developed some model RFPs, and we want to have
another dialogue with the industry."